On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 02:38:56PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Mike Solomon <[email protected]> writes: > > > I cooked up this musical example that shows both responses to upward > > and downward pressure to give you an idea of where I'm coming from. > > > > Is there a way to get this type of collision avoidance w/o a 2nd > > quanting pass? > > Actually, it would appear a third pass would be nice in order to put > sympathetic pressure on the lowest beam, decreasing the discrepancy of > its stems with the adjacent (highly compressed) stem set.
Hmm... lilypond -p 0 my_file.ly % for quick work lilypond -p 2 my_file.ly % for a draft to print out lilypond -p 9 my_file.ly % for the final score ;) Despite the joke, this is a semi-serious suggestion that I've been hoping that somebody might be interested in for years. There's a bunch of options that we can enable or disable to change the amount of processing power; it would be really nice if one (or more) people seriously looked into this, and provided an easy way to change between the "optimization" levels. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
