On 2/4/11, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:33 PM, [email protected] wrote: > >> could you make a separate patch for the engraver, fixing the issue >> below; I think the engraver can go in without further discussion. > > Done & attached, but I don't know if it's a good idea to put an engraver in > the source that doesn't do anything yet.
Well, it passes a regtest check. ;) In all seriousness, it may well be worth pushing it just to keep things organized, have everybody working from a common base, etc. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
