On 2/4/11 6:21 AM, "James Lowe" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > I'd like to continue work on this patch because there is a lot of good > stuff here, but it does still require a fair amount of editing down, but > of course I cannot upload changes because I don't own the issue. > > So I'd like to create a new issue with these changes + my own edits > incorporated, but in smaller chunks so it is easier to review for > everyone. > > Is that ok? As far as I can see, we have no policy for "forking" a patch set. Since no work has been done on this recently, and I think it's a really important addition that would be great to have in the 2.14 release, I'd say go ahead. I think that for purposes of giving credit where it's due, it would be nice to see if you can apply it in two patches -- one that has Mark's stuff, and the other that has yours. If you're going to use his examples, maybe you could create a patch with his examples and no changes to the text and then a patch with your changes to the text. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
