On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Mike Solomon <mike...@ufl.edu> wrote:
> Hey all, > > After a bit of back and forth w/ Han Wen, I have drummed up a way to split > this up such that it can be part of LilyPond in two phases. It follows his > suggestion to push all of the non-balloon-related stuff first, and to push > that second. It will set the stencil property of FootnoteItem and > FootnoteSpanner to #f in define-grobs.scm. This means that whatever people > write for the annotation part of the footnote will be swallowed up and not > used, whereas the note part on the bottom of the page will be printed. > > If anyone has arguments for pushing this whole thing in its entirety, let > me know. I am in favor of that for the reasons I stated in my previous > e-mail, but I also realize that big chunks of code pushed all at once can > make bug tracking interminable. > > If not, the plan is to push the non-balloon-related stuff today, let it > simmer for a few days, and then push the balloon related stuff used for the > in-document annotations. I will make a nice long commit message detailing > this so that, hopefully, experimental users don't waste hours figuring out > what happened to their non-appearing annotations. Alternatively, if anyone > feels that I should split this up but that I am splitting it up the wrong > way, please let me know. > That sounds fine to me. Do you have a patch showing the part you are going to push first? I was happy with the spacing-related code up until your break-visibility changes, but if you're going to include anything since then, I'd like to have another quick look (I have to catch a plane in 12 hours; if you put up your patch before then, I'll have a look right away). Cheers, Joe
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
