James Lowe <[email protected]> writes: > http://codereview.appspot.com/4248081/ > > Doc: Added @knownissue to NR for fingering > > By default double-digit fingering (i.e. >9) is not possible using > normal fingering markups. There is an LSR that has been posted for approval > at the time of this patch, and will be included in the snippet link in the > @seealso already in this section. > > Tidied up some grammar and minor punctuation changes. > > --- > > Came out of > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general/62604
Stupid question: since I can see no use for following a fingering with a digit, why don't we just change the parser appropriately? _If_ there is some use for numbers greater than 10 (apart from the current situation, button accordion fingerings may need to be underlined in order to indicate helper rows, and one could likely just put something in the engraver which does this for numbers greater 10, deducting 10 in the process), rather than making yet-another-LSR-snippet, we could just allow larger numbers. Any reason not to? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
