Graham Percival <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:48:21PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: >> Perhaps i'll aim for obliterating DIGIT altogether. > > I certainly can't think of any case in which we actually need/want > a DIGIT. I see that DIGIT was added in release/0.1.49, back in > 1998-03-17, as part of the initial version of lexer.ll and > parser.yy. Maybe it was just part of some template code that they > used? Certainly a lot has changed in the past 13 years. :) > > I definitely think it's worth investigating what happens if we > remove DIGIT entirely.
This. <URL:http://codereview.appspot.com/4311041> Please improve/discuss. This looks totally insane but does not actually change the existing absurd realities for single-digit unsigned numbers. I consider this patch the wrong way and hope everybody agrees, but it _mirrors_ the current behavior for single-digit unsigned numbers. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
