On 3/24/11 7:11 AM, "m...@apollinemike.com" <m...@apollinemike.com> wrote:
> > I got this response from Haipeng (who currently has to rely on LilyPond's > playback to catch errors) and I get the sense that the best option would be > creating a primitive form of lily -> musicxml conversion. Even if this cannot > encapsulate the full richness of LilyPond, I think that it is the best > solution that can help the most people. > I think that a lily -> musicxml conversion would be very helpful. And if it started out primitive, it could certainly be enhanced. You're certainly a much more productive programmer than me, given all the changes you've made in lilypond. But I can't imagine having any kind of musicxml output in 10 hours. Please go for it! Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
