On Mar 28, 2011, at 3:27 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Can you add a regression test for this please? > > BTW, I've just done a quick test with this snippet pair; don't you think > they look a bit weird? > > \version "2.13.56" > > % heavily damped at both broken bounds > \score { > \relative c' { > \override Glissando #'after-line-breaking = ##t > \override Glissando #'breakable = ##t > c1\glissando > \break > c'1 > } > \layout { > ragged-right = ##t > } > } > > % overshoots and swoops back down at left broken bound > \score { > \relative c' { > \override Glissando #'after-line-breaking = ##t > \override Glissando #'breakable = ##t > c1\glissando > \break > c'1 > } > }
I'll make this the regression test. Neil - you have a knack for finding the cases that break all of my work! The piece I made w/ this code looks fine. Back to the drawing board, & sorry for the premature push: it passed all the regtests & looked fine in my music. I'll have it fixed by tonight. Just a quick note - if you move all of the normalized-endpoint stuff to the end of the code, it avoids this problem, although it is still not exact. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
