Graham, )-----Original Message----- )From: Graham Percival [mailto:[email protected]] )Sent: 01 April 2011 16:27 )To: James Lowe )Cc: [email protected] )Subject: Re: landscape mode vs. new paper size ) )On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:50:07PM +0000, James Lowe wrote: )> That's OK, we can still do this with 'proper' paper sizes with )> internationally defined names rather than our own custom ones. )> )> For example, we could define some 'C' sizes which are used for )> defining envelopes, are as internationally recognised as 'A' )> sizes but come in landscape dimensions small enough to be useful for )> us to use in the doc, I think. ) )ok, great! ) )Could we get this part moving? i.e. make a separate patch for the NR 3 )chapter -- just add an extra @lilypond to the very end of the chapter, if )nothing else comes to mind -- that shows a tagline. ) )The goal(s) are: )1. get at least one paper size defined )2. get the @lilypond[options] finalized )3. feel good that after working for 3 months, there's at least one commit )on this topic. :) ) )
No problem. I'll try to get another (hopefully final) draft up by the end of the weekend. )Treat the breakbefore issue as completely separate for now. Thanks, yes please. I obviously need to re-read the LM James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
