On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:41 AM, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: >>> +nan.0 appears fine for that. But can we rely on it being available on >>> supported platforms? I don't find it in the sources of Lilypond, though >> >> It sounds a bit fishy especially since alterations are normally >> rational numbers. Why not use a non-number value to signify this? >> Maybe #f ? > > Because alterations are compared using `=' which bombs out on `#f' > (which was actually my first attempt).
I'm without context, but maybe the code should look at the comparands before comparing? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [email protected] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
