On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:01 AM, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > do we just want regression tests for things that _do_ work currently, or > is it ok to add tests for things that _should_ work but don't, as long > as the test does not bomb out?
I think adding things that don't work is not a good idea; it will confuse people, and add noise for developers. We have the bug tracker to keep track of feature requests. > changes. Adding regression tests early can also mean that bug reports > that get cured by independent work get noticed instead of remaining > open. Almost all bugfixes should be accompanied by a regtest; if they are not Graham's police should start hunting down offenders. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [email protected] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
