On Apr 22, 2011, at 6:47 AM, Graham Percival wrote: > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1612 > > My reading of the situation is this: > 1. we should turn off beam collisions for cross-staff stems > 2. we should document that such beam collisions are turned off, as: > - a @knownissue in the cross-staff stem node > - in the changes.tely > 3. the existing @knownissues patch is appreciated, but will therefore > no longer be valid > > > My impression is that #1 would be a 10-line patch or less. Am I > missing something? Can somebody make a patch for #1? > > Once that's in, I'll get #2 done in a few minutes, and this issue can be > closed.
I have a bit of time today - let me try to come up with something that allows users to keep collision avoidance, and if it doesn't pan out, I'll create a patch to turn it off. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
