On 4/26/11 5:55 AM, "m...@apollinemike.com" <m...@apollinemike.com> wrote:
> On Apr 26, 2011, at 7:30 AM, carl.d.soren...@gmail.com wrote: > >> File scm/define-grob-properties.scm (right): >> >> http://codereview.appspot.com/4442082/diff/3001/scm/define-grob-properties.sc >> m#newcode412 >> scm/define-grob-properties.scm:412: (glissando-index ,integer? "The >> index of a glissando in its note >> It seems to me like this should be an internal grob property, rather >> than a user grob property, and that it need not be part of an interface. >> I can't imagine how it ought to be tweaked by the user. > > Even if a property is moved to an internal property in > define-grob-properties.scm, doesn't it still need to be declared in an > interface so that internals.texi may be written? As far as I can see, most of the internal properties don't have interfaces. And they don't show up in internals.texi. I think I'm OK with this as a policy -- internal properties aren't to be changed by the user. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
