2011/5/3 Graham Percival <[email protected]>: > On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 01:45:09PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote: >> 2011/5/3 Francisco Vila <[email protected]>: >> > Hello, I have noticed that master is now 2.15; we on the >> > lilypond/translation branch have unmerged work and more is to come. >> > If master is now 2.15, what's the official mechanism planned for >> > incorporate latest translations to the upcoming 2.12 stable? >> >> A possible solution is that I merge into master(2.15) as usual but I >> make a list of commits for Carl to cherry-pick them onto 2.14 . Sounds >> right? > > I guess so. > > Do we really need those updates, though? I mean, that will be a > lot of commits to cherry-pick. And it'll be much worse when > translators start using 2.15-only features in their translations; > backporting any commit with those will break the stable/2.14 > build.
We could already have translated 2.15-only material, but we don't know when a material is 2.15 only, so we have probably mixed 2.14 and 2.15 translations in the same commits, making a separation very difficult. I will assume that changes in originals prior to the fork are 2.14 and translations of these will be cherry picked if I can extract them. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
