Hi Carl,

I can't comment on the code itself, but the name of the new glyph seems
wrong to me, since it implies that the existing glyph isn't for hihat.
IIRC, it was added specifically for this purpose, and looking at Elaine
Gould's example (p. 298 of Behind Bars) I'd say we already have the
correct default glyph for half-open hihat.

Cheers,
Neil

http://codereview.appspot.com/4714043/

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to