Am Samstag, 30. Juli 2011, 18:28:32 schrieben Sie:
> overall commment: the parts that do the reporting should not need to
> know about the format of loglevel.
Which parts exactly do you mean? Those that call the error/message/warning
functions, or the error/message/warning functions themselves?
> I think it would be better to have a
>
> if (log(ERROR))
> {
> ..
> }
You mean in those few places where I need to use "if (loglevel & LOG_DEBUG)",
because I can't call the debug_output function? That's a good idea to keep the
internal structure of the loglevel only inside warn.cc and provide a helper
function to access them.
> or perhaps even
>
> log(ERROR, "...")
Yes, that function is currently called non_fatal_error... Unfortunately, in
some places there is additional code in the debug case (like creating the
debug message as a string variable, or calling a different print function of
an external library to print debug output). In these cases I need an if.
Or do you mean the "if (loglevel & ERROR)" checks inside the
error/non_fatal_error/etc. function?
That would mean moving the logic whether to print a message or not to the
print_message function, so it's centralized in just one spot. That also makes
sense.
Cheers,
Reinhold
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, [email protected], http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
* http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
* LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
