Graham Percival <[email protected]> writes: > On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 09:42:36AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> Graham Percival <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > I haven't seen any interest in >> > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1771 >> >> My take on this (if nobody is going to protest in the next few hours) is >> to revert the flawed fix. > > I think that's entirely reasonable. IMO, if there's no clear > offer of a fix within 48 hours of a bad commit, we should revert > it.
Within 48 hours of pinpointing the bad commit. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
