2011/8/4 Xavier Scheuer <x.sche...@gmail.com>: > That has been registered as issue #1774, isn't it? > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1774
Not quite. Gould makes an exception for semibreves with adjacent notes; in this case, they should be aligned as if they had stems: \version "2.15.9" \new Staff \relative c' { \cadenzaOn \set Staff.implicitTimeSignatureVisibility = #all-invisible \set Staff.explicitClefVisibility = #all-invisible \set Staff.instrumentName = #"LilyPond" <f g>4 q1 <c' d e>4 q\breve << { <b c d>4 q1 <d e>4 q1 } \\ { <f, d c>4 q1 <b c>4 q1 } >> } \new Staff \relative c' { \cadenzaOn \set Staff.implicitTimeSignatureVisibility = #all-invisible \set Staff.explicitClefVisibility = #all-invisible \set Staff.instrumentName = #"Gould, p. 50" <f g>4 q1 <c' d e>4 q\breve << { <b c d>4 q1 <d e>4 q1 } \\ { <f, d c>4 q1 \once \override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #1.4 <b c>4 \once \override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #1.3 q1 } >> } I can't see anything relevant in Stone; Read is a bit vague (but I think he basically agrees with Gould on this). Cheers, Neil
<<attachment: adjacent-chord-poly.png>>
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel