Am Freitag, 5. August 2011, 19:08:43 schrieb David Kastrup: > Proposal 1: \override should not start with an internal \revert but > rather do just what the user documentation says: push its own version in > front of the existing alist of properties, without deleting existing > overrides.
That's what I would expect, too. Of course, then the list of overrides will grow with every override and might be quite large for a very long score... > Obviously, something considered bad will happen, or the code would not > go to the pains to do what it does now. What is the bad thing that will > happen? I think that only Han-Wen can answer that question. That behavior (revert if the music property pop-first ist set) was introduced in between versions 1.3.109 and 1.3.111 (commit f085824b2182c1f0fa2c5118884770ac7ff775c7 ) in November 2000. Cheers, Reinhold -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Reinhold Kainhofer, [email protected], http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
