On 8/8/11 6:07 AM, "Aleksandr Andreev" <aleksandr.andr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jan, > > Thanks for your comments. > >> In case of noteheads, i suppose that everything would be best defined in >> staff_space. For stems (as i understand there are special characters for >> stems) stafflinethickness will be more appropriate. > > Right now, I've got the notehead and stem being drawn as one > character. Is this a bad idea? It's a fine idea, as long as you don't want to have stems or beams. You'll want to remove the stem_engraver and the beam_engraver from places you use Kievan square notes. > >> However, i may be mistaken since i don't see the code. > > Here's the file I'm working with right now: > http://www.ponomar.net/files/metasuprasl.mf > > And here's a proof sheet to make your life easier: > http://www.ponomar.net/files/metasuprasl.pdf > The glyphs look very nice. I *think* you'll want to use fet_beginchar instead of beginchar. > Would it be appropriate to define a basis unit u in terms of > stafflinethickness and then specify the points in terms of u? I think that staff_space would be a better basis than stafflinethickness. staff_space governs the overall size of things. > Where is the origin? I believe that the origin is at the center of the note head. That's the basis under which I worked on the shape note heads. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel