On 2011/08/07 19:48:58, reinhold_kainhofer.com wrote:
I wouldn't go that lowlevel. I rather thought about a scheme function
that
prints a ly:warning and then returns the new definition (or calls the
new
function).
Well, it turns out my idea for object properties wouldn't work anyway since the identifier is contained in an anonymous variable object which can't access an object property. One other possibility would be to create a promise and force it when looking up the identifier. Cheers, Neil
Cheers, Reinhold -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Reinhold Kainhofer, mailto:[email protected],
http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org
http://codereview.appspot.com/4672059/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
