2011/9/11 Graham Percival <[email protected]>:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 09:35:16PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> 2011/9/11 Graham Percival <[email protected]>:
>> > ... BTW, with your fancy shiny computer, you /might/ want to try
>> > the steps to regenerate regtests without a specific commit.  First
>> > get your git repo into the state you want (i.e. release-2.15.9-1
>> > but also reverting patch abcd1234), then follow these:
>> > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/release-extra-notes
>> > It won't be fun, but it's doable... and if you can make a regtest
>> > comparison without the change-everything commit(s) with an hour or
>> > two of fumbling around and recompiling stuff, you could save
>> > people an hour (or more) of manually comparison regtests.
>>
>> Would it perhaps be wise to do a separate release containing only such
>> particular change-everything commit next time one appeares?
>
> Are you offering to build that yourself?  Because I'm not offering
> to do it.

Ok, so this wasn't a wise idea.  Sorry for the noise!
Janek

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to