2011/9/15 Janek Warchoł <[email protected]>: > 2011/9/15 Graham Percival <[email protected]>: >> ** Unchanged branches >> (...) >> stable/* > > I'm wondering if we can get rid of them, but i'm not sure about one > thing: are they just a point in our history, i.e. > <first commit> ... (lots of commits) ...<2.x stable release commit> > ... (lots of commits) ... <current master>?
No. That looks like a tag in a branch. > Or are they true branches, i.e. not a subset of master? Yes. Branches are not subsets. They keep independent histories. > In the first case maybe we could just use git tags? (or is my question > stupid because we are already using them?) Yes we are already using them, No tags and branches do not provide similar features, and No your question is not stupid. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
