On 17 September 2011 12:16, m...@apollinemike.com <m...@apollinemike.com> wrote:
> They should be applied separately - 5038042 fixes 1881, and 5057041 prunes > down bloated code. There is a chance that 5057041 is effected by 5038042 (I > haven't tested them together yet) though I doubt it. After their countdowns, > I'd push 5038042 first, rerun regtests on 5057041, and then either push > 5057041 or modify it if necessary. I wouldn't bother with a countdown for this patch. It's simple enough to apply immediately. Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
