http://codereview.appspot.com/5293060/diff/2001/lily/beam.cc File lily/beam.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5293060/diff/2001/lily/beam.cc#newcode987 lily/beam.cc:987: Beam::calc_x_span (Grob *me_non_spanner, Grob *commonx) Why should the x-span of a line-broken beam depend on whether we requested that it have consistent slope across the break? Shouldn't the 'span' of a broken beam always go to the end of the beam, beyond the last stem, for the purposes used in Beam::print() ? If not, what use-case will break when we choose consistent-broken-slope after this patch ? http://codereview.appspot.com/5293060/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
