On Nov 17, 2011, at 5:46 AM, David Kastrup wrote:

> Keith OHara <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>> Keith OHara <k-ohara5a5a <at> oco.net> writes:
>> 
>>> Several of Mike's new regression tests suffer from issue 1723
>>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1723
>>> 
>>> We can apply the workaround for issue 1723 to these regression tests.
>> 
>> Added stemlets to work around the intermittency, and pushed to
>> staging.
> 
> Sorry, but that's totally wrong.  We need to address this issue, not try
> hiding it.  I have seen no attempt to address it.  There has been no
> discussion that has sanctified such a mad course of action, not on the
> list as far as I can see, and not on the issue itself, and no proposed
> Rietveld patch and review for such a controversial course of action.  I
> have deleted this from staging and hope it has not yet entered the
> queue.
> 
> -- 
> David Kastrup
> 

Ditto - I'll be able to be on it during a flight if I can't sleep or on Tuesday 
afternoon if I can.

Cheers,
MS
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to