> It turns out that display-scheme-music, unlike typical display-*
> functions, returns the value it displays. The LilyPond code base
> (including regtests) does not make use of that feature, and it is
> totally disruptive when used on the Guile command line (because then
> any use of display-scheme-music will be followed by the
> Guile-internal printed representation of the music object).
Thanks for telling.
> Just in case anybody is surprised that I am not even interested in
> wasting the effort of coaching a sanity change like that through the
> proper channels.
This is OK with me. It certainly saves a lot of time.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
