On Dec 17, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > > On Dec 17, 2011, at 8:51 AM, "Phil Holmes" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Some of the output from make doc comes deliberately from regression tests. >> For example, woodwind-diagrams-key-lists.ly puts lots of information similar >> to the following on the terminal screen: >> >> Printing keys in verbose mode for: piccolocc possibilities for one: (one >> oneT oneRT oneTR oneR oneRT1q one1qTR oneRT1h one1hTR oneRT3q one3qTR oneRTF >> oneFTR one1qT oneT1q one1q one1qT1h one1hT1q one1qT3q one3qT1q one1qTF >> oneFT1q one1hT oneT1h one1h one1hT3q one3qT1h one1hTF oneFT1h one3qT oneT3q >> one3q one3qTF oneFT3q oneFT oneF) >> > >> >> Thoughts, please? > > > In this case, the regtest is really more documentation than regtest. I think > that simplifying and reducing the regtest is the right thing to do. > > Thanks, > > Carl >
This regtest makes sure that the key-name function works for all instruments - I'd be open to other options that do the same thing w/o printing all of this stuff. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
