On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 05:06:49PM +0100, Julien Rioux wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Graham Percival > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks, pushed. You're responsible for closing the issue. > > The google issue or the rietveld issue or both?
Both, but most importantly the google issue. google issue: a pointer rietveld: memory. Very occasionally we'll look at open patches in rietveld from people we know to see how many patches we've lost, so closing that as well could reduce some confusion in the future. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
