Documentation writers: Is it correct to say as a general rule that if a file has a .itexi extension, it does not contain @nodes?
http://codereview.appspot.com/5493074/diff/1/make/website.make File make/website.make (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5493074/diff/1/make/website.make#newcode189 make/website.make:189: website-xrefs: website-version website-bibs $(OUT) $(xref-files) On 2011/12/20 19:08:11, Graham Percival wrote:
Do the xrefs really depend on website-bibs? I thought the generated
.itexi
files for bibs only had an @itemize. Or is this a precautionary
measure in case
we ever add @nodes to those?
You are right, we don't need to track that dependency because there are no @nodes in the texi files generated from the bib files. http://codereview.appspot.com/5493074/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
