On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 14:33:33 -0800, <pkx1...@gmail.com> wrote:
I disagree. The example in the tracker is overly complicated for what (I still maintain) is easily explained. However *if* we really do need an example then the \hideNotes one is not ideal. I struggled myself with that one in the tracker, it isn't a 'tiny example' by any stretch of the imagination and I knew perfectly well what was meant by the problem only *after* I read the text explanation, the picture on the tracker added nothing for me.
Okay, then. You are addressing the fact that the beam was not un-hidden mid-stroke, because no properties are changed mid-stroke. So this makes sense as a knownissue The other way looking at the bug report is that \hideNotes seems to have removed the automatic beam. ( What is your man going on about with the "beam properties"? I don't see any beam. Do you see a beam? ) For that aspect, I'll add a few words and beamed notes to the second example of NR 1.7.1 \hideNotes : + Note heads, stems, flags, and beams are invisible, but other = objects that are attached to invisible notes are still visible. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
