On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:48:49AM -0800, Graham Percival wrote: > Since there isn't much interest in cleaning > up compiler warnings[1] so that we can use automatic tools to > identify such problematic occurrences, I guess we'll just stumble > forward as usual. > > [1] if your version of g++ doesn't find a ton of warnings -- on > any architecture -- try using clang 3.0.
This is a general form of "your" to mean "any person", not aimed specifically at David. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
