2012/1/8 Marc Hohl <m...@hohlart.de>: > Are you sure the attached patch is up-to-date with your work? > I get a small change clef in the fifth line, see attachment.
I get the same result as Janek. I think the problem is that the glyph-name callback checks break-status, thus shouldn't be called from the engraver (it's too early, then gets cached when accessed later in the print callback). Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
