On 2012/01/10 07:08:29, MikeSol wrote:
LGTM. Good work!
The only think I'd ask is that you change the markup syntax before
pushing the
patch. I think that, if the distinction between footnote and
auto-footnote is
going to be eliminated, it needs to be categorical.
Optional arguments are not implemented for markup functions, so no can do. It is an obvious contender once they are. As a stopgap measure, one might think about using ##f or something to that effect instead of \default. autoFootnote and auto-footnote have been different before, so I don't consider it really urgent to squeeze this in while markup functions have not received the treatment. http://codereview.appspot.com/5527058/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
