Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> writes: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 12:18:57PM +0000, carl.d.soren...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> I think you misunderstand what git rebase does. git rebase >> origin/staging does *not* bring origin/staging into dev/cg; > > really? wow, I completely misunderstood that.
If it didn't bring it into dev/cg, what else would it do when dev/cg is the currently checked out branch (which I assume this is about)? If it didn't bring origin/staging into dev/cg, how could you then push the HEAD of dev/cg as a fastforward into origin/staging? >> If origin/staging is bad, and then deleted, and then built again >> as a new origin/staging, the developer can get the appropriate >> set of commits by just reissuing git rebase origin/staging. > > ok, sounds great! Too good to be true. See comment in the issue. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
