On 22/01/2012 3:00 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2012/1/22 Graham Percival<gra...@percival-music.ca>:
why are you asking this question? Is the source code really
*that* hard to read? It's 18 lines!
Hey, i'm not a pro programmer. There are so many brilliant
programmers here that my self-confidence is quite low; this is second
time i read Python and first time i read building scripts. And i
don't want to do some stupid mistake, break Patchy and cause
unexpected damage to origin/staging and/or origin/master, which would
result in more problems that i'm trying to solve.
https://github.com/gperciva/lilypond-extra/blob/master/patches/compile_lilypond_test.py#L282
for patch in patches:
issue_id = patch[0]
patch_filename = patch[1]
title = patch[2]
print "Trying %i with %s" % (issue_id, patch_filename)
try:
autoCompile.configure()
autoCompile.patch(patch_filename)
autoCompile.build(quick_make=True,
issue_id=issue_id)
autoCompile.regtest_check(issue_id)
autoCompile.copy_regtests(issue_id)
autoCompile.make_regtest_show_script(issue_id,
title)
# reverse stuff
autoCompile.patch(patch_filename, reverse=True)
autoCompile.regtest_clean(issue_id)
autoCompile.clean(issue_id)
except Exception as err:
print "Problem with issue %i" % issue_id
print err
Yes, i've read this 2 times. If i didn't i wouldn't ask the question.
Janek.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi Janek,
The autoCompile.patch part is defined here:
https://github.com/gperciva/lilypond-extra/blob/master/patches/compile_lilypond_test.py#L140
You'll see that the code uses
git apply filename.patch
and
git apply --reverse filename.patch
I think that is what you would like to modify following the suggestions
on this thread.
Cheers,
Julien
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
