Reinhold Kainhofer <[email protected]> writes: > On 2012-02-02 18:11, Phil Holmes wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Kastrup" <[email protected]> >> To: "Phil Holmes" <[email protected]> >>> >>>> I believe James indicated his big machine was on 24x7 - hence my >>>> instructions if he has some time to look at this. >>> >>> I think that this would be the preferable solution. Even though patchy >>> is quite less painful on my current machine than on the one I had been >>> using a few days ago, it takes its time. >> >> My box runs it quite quickly and is not used for anything else. It >> has to be turned on to run patchy though. Suggest you leave it to >> me for now unless you're experimenting. > > My new office machine (on 24/7) is quite a powerful beast, and I > usually don't to any expensive calculations. So, I can certainly set > up a cronjob to run patchy regularly.
Since I just pushed about 4 patches (2 of them from me) and there has been another translation merge (they tend to be prone to surprises in particular when we have syntax changes), I started a patchy staging run right now and it should be through in about 1-2 hours. I want the feedback timely in case anything went wrong. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
