On 2/10/12 12:52 PM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> writes: > >> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 08:16:53PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: >>> gra...@percival-music.ca writes: >>> >>> > However, there is clearly no desire to >>> > actually create that two-line patch, so I guess that removing >>>support is >>> > the thing to do. >>> >>> Again: I don't have a clue about the involved work. But if it isn't >>> happening, there is no point in never releasing something for those >>> platforms which we _do_ actively support. >> >> Agreed; if you fix the other comments in my review, I'll give it a >> LGTM. I'm just giving one more chance to somebody to care about >> this. > >Sure thing. When this will be going on countdown, I was also going to >copy it to the user list. I also plan on mentioning it in the next >LilyPond Report (no idea about when I'll be working seriously on that, >hopefully soon), whether before or after 2.16 has been released. But as >long as no users are seriously worrying about OSX 10.4 (and the only one >actually offering a bounty was not doing this out of personal need, but >because of sympathy with possibly mythical legacy users), there does not >seem much of a point to expend the work, even if it is just few hours, >for caring.
I will take a stab at the two-line patch tomorrow. Thanks, Carl > >-- >David Kastrup > > >_______________________________________________ >lilypond-devel mailing list >lilypond-devel@gnu.org >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
