On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:08:42PM -0000, Phil Holmes wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Percival" > <[email protected]> > >(I recommend running Patchy as a separate user just in case stuff > >blows up) > > I kind of thought you were suggesting not experimenting with > patchy-test at this point. I also didn't want to get in the way of > David's testing. However, if needed I could do this as well, > although turnaround times would not be as good from next Monday on.
I've been debating for the past week about sending an email to -devel saying that somebody should be doing this. It's challenging to decide when I should nag people (or "clarify the situation") or not. Anyway: I think we need more people running Patchy. It's not in perfect shape, but it's a lot easier than the build system was when you first started working on that. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
