On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 05:27:08PM -0000, Phil Holmes wrote: > As an improvement to patchy, wouldn't it be better for patchy to > test for a "stop-patchy" branch and abort if it finds one? Then all > that would be necessary to suspend the cron job would be to create a > branch with that name.
No; if there's an emergency, deleting staging is no more effort than creating a new branch. Now, it could well be worth writing some test into patchy wherein if there's something suspicious in the git history for staging, it refuses to test it. Patches appreciated. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
