On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 05:53:57PM +0000, Carl Sorensen wrote: > On 3/16/12 11:44 AM, "no-re...@google-melange.appspotmail.com" > <no-re...@google-melange.appspotmail.com> wrote: > >Unfortunately, we were unable to accept your organization's application > >at this time. > > If we are serious about doing this next year, I think we need to develop a > stronger website around GSOC. As I read the requirements, it appears to > me that to be competitive we need to have a more fully-developed > infrastructure. > > If we really want to do this, we should probably start talking about next > year now.
It might be good to wait a week to see what projects were accepted, then compare our current GSoC website to theirs. What do they have that we lack? There are obviously things like "previous GSoC history", "publicity in general", "usefulness and appeal to a wide range of users", but what differences are there on the project websites themselves? That said, I think that improving our development infrastructure in general is always a good thing, and there are many ways this can be improved if/when people want to work on it. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
