On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Looks right: The area between horizontal skylines should influence the >>> spacing. However, I think we need a parameter to adjust the amount of >>> influence. >> >> I'm not sure what you mean. > > I mean that some people probably want a more rigid spacing, only > slightly influenced by the area inbetween. This is a matter of taste > > [...] I would like to have an additional parameter, say, > > system-system-spacing #'rigidity = X > > where X is a number between 0 and 1. Value 1 essentially means no > skyline integrals, while value 0 exactly the opposite.
Maybe. We'll see when there is some working code. I'd like to have as few parameters as possible, to make things simpler (within reason). >> I've identified two potential problems that may appear, and ideas >> for solutions: >> >> www.anonstorage.net/PStorage/621.skyline-integrals-teeth-marked.pdf >> www.anonstorage.net/PStorage/328.integrals-pitfall-two-marked.pdf > > A possible solution is to `dampen' the skyline for the area > computation, this is, to apply the beam logic to the skyline. For > example, this > > ---------- > | > | > | > | > ----------------------------- > > becomes this: > > --------- > \ > \ > \ > \ > ------------ That's what i meant (for the first problem). thanks, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
