On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Trevor Daniels <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Janek > > An impressive collection of suggested enhancements! I hope your exams don't > suffer!
We'll see, we'll see :) > Most look excellent to me, but I have comments on a couple of them which > I'll add to the issues themselves. Many thanks! On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:55 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed - this is fantastic work. I'm happy to hear that! > I wish there were more reports of this quality. It'd make it easier to fix > stuff. I have more! Reports about augmentation dots, dynamics and articulation placement, stem lengths, horizontal spacing, tie shapes, beam positions - You name it! All i need is time to write them in a tidy manner - it's extremely time-consuming. I estimate that this Lyrics Report took about 30 hours to write, and i was collecting engraved examples since summer. I'll do my best adding more reports - however some other things, like improving contributor workflow and organizing a Kickstarter project, keep my mind busy... not mentioning GSoC. > I have a pretty good sense of how difficult each issue will be to fix - lemme > know if you need an order of attack once you get cracking on these problems. Sure! I'm writing my GSoC application now (it will include my plan for doing these issues), and i'll post it on the list when it's finished (hopefully today) - please comment on it! On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Jan-Peter Voigt <[email protected]> wrote: > what a great list of improvements to look forward to. I solve these issues > most times with lengthy overrides boxed in music-functions ... if there is a > way of helping (testing?), let me know! Sure, any help with testing and designing good solutions is welcome! I'll keep you informed. thanks! Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
