On Apr 2, 2012, at 5:05 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote: > On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 1:55 PM, [email protected] > <[email protected]> wrote: >> It's just the opposite - the use of technical details shows a lack of >> clarity of understanding, as it attaches importance to things that may >> change depending on the implementation as opposed to design. Stay on the >> design level. I'd define early on the concepts of engraver and grob and >> then use them as a ritornello. >> >> GNU is not there to >> finance other LilyPond developers - they're there to finance you. You need >> to be confident and assertive and sell yourself. They need to have the >> impression that you know exactly what you're doing, know exactly how you're >> going to go about it, and that you're worth every penny of what you're going >> to do. > > Many thanks for the tips, Mike! I attach the revised application at > the bottom, and i will submit it later today (applications can be > edited until deadline).
Looks good! It's much more assertive and professional & it's an easier read as well. Good luck! Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
