Graham Percival <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 08:33:27AM +0100, James wrote: >> If I notice one - Mike S for instance - not picking on him especially >> but in the olden days when he was 'quick-patch-McMike', and when I was >> checking patches manually, I'd fix the tracker myself as I could see >> who was the Rietveld owner. > > Just leave those for Mike to push. We're not in any rush. > >> I've been pushing patches (Alberto, Pavel, Peter) for those trackers >> that don't have a dev who has push access, > > yes, because we don't have a Frog meister. Or do we? I honestly > can't remember what happened the last time it came up. > >> and as part of my bug shift >> (on Saturdays if I remember) because I am aware of this, I'll skim >> 'push' labeled trackers or 'review' labeled trackers and assign them >> owners if I can. > > doesn't git-cl assign an owner? if not, it should. There's no > reason why a human needs to do this manually.
It definitely doesn't. And state "Accepted" instead of "Started" is also less than optimal for starting a review. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
