On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 07:06:50PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > I did it as a single patch because it really makes sense like that. > There's a lot of changes going on here. 63 deletions from new.
Deleting files from new has nothing to do with a full LSR import. That is a separate change. > If I could have worked out how to split them, while at the same time > being able to keep track of what changes were still needed, I would > have done. However, doing things like having a screech-boink.ly in > new, with a screech-and-boink.ly in snippets, Having a screech-boink.ly and a screen-and-boink.ly in snippets for a few hours wouldn't be a bad thing. > I've now got an even more humungous patch which includes the added > files. My preference would be to push to staging, patchy and revert > if there's a problem. *shrug* ok, if you want. I really think you're making life more complicated for yourself, but ok. > What's the syntax for a revert? In the case of staging, you delete the current staging branch, then make a new one. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
