Carl Sorensen <[email protected]> writes:
> On May 5, 2012, at 8:16 PM, "David Kastrup" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> But what about <>\footnote: that does not have this problem.
>>
>> In fact, isn't <> generally prettier than s1*0? Should we be using it
>> in code and documentation rather than s1*0?
>
>
> What a great idea! No notes generated; the duration doesn't change.
>
> Does <> take any time?
No. Time for <> is registered by putting the same duration on every
element inside of the EventChord.
There is a drawback, though. q is changed. Now q is implemented as <>
but with the current duration on it. Which would mean that the total
moment of
{ c4 <> q }
would likely change when q gets expanded. While <c> _is_ considered for
q for consistency's sake, perhaps <> should be made to leave it alone.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
