On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:51:45AM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > On 13/05/12 23:34, Graham Percival wrote: > >LilyPond itself will remain as a command-line "compiler". So this > >question can be split into two separate ones: > >- what capabilities should alternate programs (i.e. frescobaldi) > > have? > >- what should the input syntax be? > > When considering these questions, can some attention be given to the > possibilities of "real-time" update to the score output, as the code > is tweaked?
No. LilyPond is a command-line "compiler". That's something that would happen in an alternate program. Consideration will be given to overall compile speed, but that's it. A really intelligent editor could only update sections of the score at once (via the clip or skipMeasures functionality), but again that's back to "alternate program" territory. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
