Yuck, but harmless.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6215069/diff/1/lily/tie-engraver.cc File lily/tie-engraver.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6215069/diff/1/lily/tie-engraver.cc#newcode240 lily/tie-engraver.cc:240: for (; it != heads_to_tie_.end (); ++it) The vector iterator supports < and that makes a more-recognizable loop idiom, but I guess != would work as well. The post-fix version is more common in loops so humans read it more quickly. I guess the pre-fix version promises makes it easier for the compiler to see we don't need the value before the increment. Humans are more important than compilers. http://codereview.appspot.com/6215069/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
