On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:19 PM, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am currently rewriting footnote documentation, and I got the somewhat > embarrassing screenshot > > > > It would appear that the dimensions of the Beam grob are located at the > note where LilyPond _decides_ where to end the beam, not where the beam > then actually ends. > > Anybody have a suggestion what might be at work here? For what it is > worth, this should pretty much be the behavior of the old > \footnoteAutoGrob or whatever else it was called, too.
As you may know the auto beaming is weird, because it has to emit a Beam after the real end point has already passed. However, wouldnt it be easier to simply use manual beams in the example? Putting a footnote on something automatically generated sounds like a bad practice, since it stops making sense when you alter the autobeaming rules. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [email protected] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
